-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Meta
Trickle Down or Piss On
Posted in Religion, economics, philosophy, politics, torture, woo
Leave a comment
Free Sanal Edamaruku
arty like it’s 999. An Indian skeptic was charged with blasphemy. Recently. In 2012. In Mumbai. Not Milan, Mumfuckingbai. His crime? Pointing out, yet again, the utter depravity of the Catlicks. While they aren’t raping kids as far as we know, just preying on the poor by aggressively marketing a blessed miracle – Buddy Jebus weeping to the tune of silver clinking into plates. Yes, it’s the ol’ weeping statue trick, 99. That’s the umpteenth time in the last century.
Asked by a TV channel to investigate, Sanal Edamaruku found, mystery of mysteries, capillary action miraculously drawing the water up from a drain underneath the statue to dribble out the feet.
“Sanal explained his findings and accused the concerned Catholic Church officials of miracle mongering, as they were beating the big drum for the drippling Jesus statue with aggressive PR measures and by distributing photographs certifying the “miracle”. A heated debate began, in which the five church people, among them Fr. Augustine Palett, the priest of Our Lady of Velankanni church, and representatives of the Association of Concerned Catholics (AOCC) demanded that Sanal apologize.”
Of course, seeing as they felt persecuted by valid criticism of their holy work of taking advantage, they filed charges and Edamaruku must surrender to the police.
“Yesterday (10th April,2012) Sanal received a phone call from a Police official of Juhu Police Station in Mumbai directing him to come to the said police station to face the charges and get arrested. He also said that FIRs have also been filed in Andheri and some other police stations u/s 295 of Indian Penal Code on the allegations of hurting the religious sentiments of a particular community.”
Kitty corner to this is the Indian constitution, which states in Article 51-A, clause h:
“It shall be the duty of every citizen of India to develop the scientific temper, humanism and spirit of inquiry and reform.”
So, in following the Indian Constitution Sanal contravened their penal code. His defence? The Constitution?
It is alleged Sanal hurt the sentiments of a particular religious community. Hmmm, don’t the religious sentiments of other communities always offend any particular community? At least in hushed, conspiratorial tones if not publicly like the Micks or die vater von Lutherans.
Just think,the thugs who created this contradiction of rights have their finger on India’s nuclear trigger…
Posted in Catholicism, politics
Leave a comment
Buddhist Brainfarts
y golly gosh, nirvana! I stumbled across this at Big Think and left a pithy comment that I’ll expand on here. As the original post is titled “How Buddhism Differs From Judeo-Christian Religions”, and the following are the first words of the speaker, you’d think the video would be quite short.
“Buddha says, “There is no creator other than mind.”
That is a great difference and really needs no further explanation. But he goes further and shows there’s not much difference after all.
“Rather than talk about who created “the world”, it is more pragmatic, more practical, more relevant to actually ask yourself who created your world.”
This is starting to raise suspicions because he used ‘the fingers thing’ to put the quotes around “the world” but not your world. He goes on to confirm them by explaining his wee chat in terms of how people hear and see it differently, uniquely:
“So, for example, like this talk, you know, my answering this question . . . Everybody who hears this is going to hear it in a different way. So you’re going to hear it in your way, I’m hearing it in my way, and whoever, you know, is watching this, is hearing it in their own individual way.”
For him, this begs the question:
“Where is the talk? Where is the answer?”
Which is actually two questions, but the talk is a viddy on the intertubes and the answer is forthcoming, I’m sure. Aren’t I?
“And actually we have to say, then, there is no answer outside of the perception of the answer. The answer is always linked to an individual perceiver. And so from that point of view, everybody is experiencing their own answer.”
This sounds like he’d regurgitate Quantum Theory and a certain cat-in-a-box when called for clarification. He switches to “viewing” and “experiencing” uniqueness as if they are separate from hearing when experiencing a viddy:
“So similarly, you know, everyone is having their own view of me right now. Each one of you is experiencing me uniquely.”
True to a point, but he is the only one speaking and we are all going to experience, watch, or hear the same words he assembled for this talk. Or are we?
“Therefore, the “me” that you’re experiencing is not outside your mind. From that point of view, who created me, for you? You did. Because I’m not outside your mind.”
The speaker doesn’t exist but in my mind?
“”So, if that’s true for me, it’s actually true for the world. Your world is a reflection of your mind.”
So the waning moon of cheese outside my window as I type wasn’t floating there for the several billion years that passed until a talking monkey could pixellate such narcissistic gibberish?
Perhaps he’ll remember this one day when there’s a knock at the door and a complete stranger hoofs him in the yarbles and flees gibbering “there are no yarbles, no pain other than my mind”…
Mealsothinks, his P&M might quibble aboot my being his creator.
He is a creation of mine, therefore the world into which we are squeezed is a reflection of our thoughts. Even when mere picoseconds old? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is more likely, so maybe after that I dreamt up Gavrilo Prinzip, Louie Armstrong and my grandparents? He doesn’t exist “outside my mind” because my foot hasn’t met his yarbles, therefore “it’s true for the world”.
See how creation is the same as perception and reflection which equal the obvious fact that Morten exists? Humpty-Dumpty would be proud.
Is this not solipsism in spicy peanut sauce? Morten says this idea is tremendously optimistic because it connects you to everything. Interestingly, there is a thing called solipsism syndrome where the person becomes withdrawn and detached because the idea of a universe which only exists in their mind is a very lonely one. The ultimate in narcissism.
“And so if I change my mind, I actually change my world. Like, if I have a lot of anger in my mind, the world that I perceive is a world full of conflict and, you know, irritating people and stuff like that. Whereas, if I have a lot of love in my heart, then the world that I perceive is completely different. It’s a beautiful world and it’s full of attractive people and, you know, a place of love and kindness. So, it shows that if we work at changing our mind, we can change our world.”
Not only does this paragraph give off a Stepford or Landru vibe, it sounds awfully like that “The Secret” shite and it’s Law of Attraction where the positiveness of your thoughts is responsible for the niceness of what happens to you. If you have bad thoughts you will be mugged while on vacation. Seriously. At $40 a pop for book or DVD, that’s the secret.
Regardless, he forgets or ignores that these are his words, he assembled them into this video he created and they are the same words everyone will see and hear him say, or later read a transcript, perhaps with their fingertips.
What happened to the great mass of the history of our beautiful blue marble, much less the universe, without any people on it to say “your world is in your mind”? What about the heinous things we’ve done to each other for the last several thousand years with the blessings of doG? It all becomes sunshine, lollipops and rainbows because you fill your heart with love.
So far Buddhism seems a lot like any other religion – wobbly thinking and vague, slippery language unbound. The only thing missing is multiple flavours of Buddhism. Wait, found them. Just like the Big Three, they can’t agree amongst themselves as there are several schools selling their interpretation of their prophit. The flavour Morten swallowed, The New Kadampa Tradition, has broken away all Schism-like from Tibet in what is known as the Dorje Shugden Controversy.
How people comprehend his words will be unique, sure, and from these we will create an opinion of them and maybe of him but, create him? No. These words conveying his ideas will remain unchanged. Unless he changes his mind, which isn’t likely as he’s now going on about Buddhism being the science of the mind since he posted this.
What is it with these spiritual gurus and their obsession with having the blessings of science and the requisite misunderstanding of what it is. In this more recent video where he is only in my mind, and didn’t walk into a studio with at least some idea of what he was going to say, he invokes the divine in describing his schtick.
Vive la difference…
Posted in Buddhism, Religion, philosophy, woo
Leave a comment
The Dao of Dow
ow Marmur writes to enlighten and inform us of the significance of two Jewish holidays, Purim & Passover. Or With God on our side, redux. He opens like Henny Youngman – “They wanted to annihilate us. God saved us. Now let’s eat.” – which segues into the “history” behind the humour.
Beginning with Purim, he admits the Biblical accounts have no history:
“There seems to be no historic basis for the story. The fact that it has found its way into holy writ suggests that it nevertheless reflected a recurring, terrible reality for those who shaped the biblical canon.”
Passover is based on the book of Exodus where doG’s chosen fled from Egypt. This too, has no history behind it. There’s no archeological support for the enslavement or escapee encampments:
In the case of Israel, the search is not for a “needle in a haystack”. The bible documents the locations. The years of archaeological searching only
affirms that (especially Christian)archaeologists anticipate being able to find artifacts from 2,000,000 Israelites…
In light of modern day archaeological capabilities, the Exodus story has to be highly suspect when after so many years of repeated archaeological surveys using the latest scientifically advanced equipment and techniques in all regions of the peninsula including the mountainous area around Mt. Sinai, provides not a single archaeological artifact, not a single sherd, or not a trace of a campsite from the alleged 2,000,000 Israelites wandering 40 years in the desert. – Did Israel’s Exodus From Egypt Actually Happen?
If the numbers are off, even 250,000 slaves leaving would have been a significant event in Egyptian history, but nada:
Does Egypt’s detailed chronology record Egypt’s pharaohs, major events, i.e. wars, treaties, commerce, personalities?…Yes.
Does Egyptian chronology mention Joseph and the 7 year famine?…No. Israel’s 600,000 male population?…No. Moses?…No. Moses confrontation with Pharaoh?…No. Israel’s 2,000,000 people Exodus (50% of Egypt’s then total population)?…No. Pharaoh’s army including 600 chariots drowning in the Nile?…No. Egypt’s total desolation from the Exodus?…No. Would events of this magnitude merit mention in Egyptian papyri, stele, or tomb inscriptions?…Yes. – Did Israel’s Exodus From Egypt Actually Happen?
Two festivals, apparently based on events spun out of thin air represent doG saving the Biblical authors from “a recurring, terrible reality”. Perhaps they are just fanciful tales meant to build an ‘us’. A very special ‘us’ solely favoured by The Great Maker. It doesn’t bode well for ‘them’ – everyone else – does it? Seeing as if you’re not with us “yer agin us”. And doG.
It isn’t for want of trying that nothing has been found. Like Noah’s Ark or a 6000 year old creation, there are plenty of people who want these things to be. There was an article in National Geographic a while back about archeology in the Holey Land. One archaeologist, a true believer, saw everything as Biblical proof. Another saw the artifacts as being more in line with what we already know aboot the era which is more likely, but isn’t the grandiose tale people wish was so. Just another tribe among many in the area isn’t very sexy without a doG to the rescue.
Moving on to “modern times”, Marmur mentions the Crusades, Russian pogroms and German Nazis. These events most certainly do represent a terrible reality for Jews, no question. They also represent Christians, as Marmur writes, “engaged in the sacred task of working with God to eradicate evil everywhere.”
The Crusades were largely aboot driving the evil from Jerusalem. Muslim or Jew, no matter “doG wills it” and “knows his own”. As a bonus, Jews were handily scattered nearby too. The Russian pogroms of the 1800s were fostered by state policies meant to drive out or force Jews to convert to Russian Orthodox. They even set aside a large acreage for them to live in, which also made the pogroms easier.
The German Nazis, often wrongly championed as atheist, were largely Lutheran and Catholic helping doG do Her thing. Back in the day, Martin Luther was a well known Zionist whose ideas of tolerance were held in high regard by the Nazi High Command. Even if the High Command were 100% atheist (not likely as atheists made the shit-list too) and Mr. Hilter wasn’t a Catholic in good standing, they were able to convince tens of millions of patriotic believers that a little liebensraum was in order and Jewish shop owners were in the way. Ironically, some of the victims were decorated, veteran patriots of Germany’s first crack at elbow room.
The problem is, the “they” in Marmur’s three examples have a doG whispering in their ears too. In this case
the very same doG for ‘us’ and ‘them’ and, so it happens, the fashionably evil Muslims when they deluded into existence upon Gabe speaking to Mo.
It looks like this doG is playing all sides for Her own twisted enjoyment. Yet assisting this deity will somehow “lead to a better future”, according to Marmur. Here’s how someone from the oxymoronically named Rational Christianity justifies assisting doG with genocide annihilation:
“It’s true that God gave the commands to the leaders of the Israelites, but in all the cases where the Israelites were told by a leader to destroy a population, they had plenty of prior evidence that the leader was in fact anointed by God and could be trusted to deliver God’s commands. The three leaders who passed on these commands were Moses, Joshua, and Samuel.”
“When the Israelites destroyed a population, they were acting as God’s tools, not taking matters into their own hands. God made it clear to them that he was the one behind their victories (Jdg 7:2-3, Josh 5:13-14). In many cases, the nations were defeated by miracles of God (Josh 6, 10:8-14), and in all cases the Israelites were victorious only because they were following God, who gave them the victory (Josh 10:42).”
A better future through genocide! Despite The Israelites having helped doG in the distant past in these endeavors against the Midianites and Canaanites et al not seeming to have had any prophylactic effect for them more recently, we are to believe doG’w will is now co-operation with other faiths rather than the annihilation of them – contrary to the poetic lessons of The BuyBull and the idea of being doG’s special wee snowflakes.
Posted in Israel, Judaism, Religion, journalism, woo
Leave a comment
Phuq Tom Collins

en in dresses who live in glass cathedrals full of child rapists, their enablers and apologists shouldn’t throw stones.
According to our newly minted Weergin in Red, who had barely donned his dress, Canada is:
a society grown jaded in the sense of the spiritual, in the sense of the presence of God – Cardinal Tom Collins
Really? Would his idea of utopia, a Christian Catholic theocracy somehow fix Canada? Make it better morally and ethically? Nicer?
Remember, his International Order of Pedophilic Prophit$ had their day when they held full sway over the West. You know, The Dark Ages, The Inquisition and various other hunts, pogroms, Crusades or library burnings. The last century or so wasn’t much better as God is always on one side or the other, if not both, jawohl?
More recently, the local Separate School Board Trustees had to take ethics classes for:
Collins mentions Catholics in Iraq and other countries being shot for attending mass. Ever the victim, Captains of Christian Industry religiously ignore the role their favourite myth played in blowing up Iraqis just going about about their daily lives and which inexorably led to scenes like this:
“… hands behind his back and forcing him to lie beneath a large water tank, they pry his mouth open, hold it in place with a stick and then turn on the spigot. When his stomach is full to bursting, the soldiers begin pounding on it with their fists, stopping only when the water, now mixed with gastric juices has poured from his mouth and nose. Then they turn on the spigot again. The technique which was perfected during The Spanish Inquisition, produced in its victims the “simultaneous sensations of drowning and of being burned or cut as internal organs stretched and convulsed.” – Candice Millard, “Looking for a Fight” The NY Times Book Review 2.19.12
Which, surprisingly for some, results in reprisals against the crusaders invaders liberators and anyone like them. My mistake, that paragraph describes the US Army using the “water cure” while liberating the Philippines from Spain in 1898. I’m sure the technique in Iraq today is as sophisticated as water-boarding sounds benign. Perhaps this evolution in information gathering is what Collins meant by the church being “vibrant and alive”.
While one could certainly could say
The US is jaded in the presence of God, today they are roughly twice as church going and nearly 5 times as likely to attend as us slackers de la nord. To the right are US troops doing God’s work on the Filipinos, when I’m sure they were much nearer His Bosom.
Here’s a travel snap
in case the quick sketch for the cover of one of the most popular US magazines of the last century isn’t clear on la ancienne technique:

And one from the 1960′s using an evolved technique. More sophisticated like the theology that birthed it, yet somehow familiar like the theology…
All examples of the faithful failing at being morally or ethically sound, yet quite in line with God’s ways if you read the BuyBull holistically.
Yet, Tom says Canada needs more of his brand of woo.
Free Will!! Ah, well. According to yet another theological sophisto whose book I’ll be reading and reviewing soon, there’s no such thing. It’s turtles all the way down…
Update
Coincidently, a regular contributor to the Star opinion page informs that Israel is doing die Werke Gottes too:
But the emphasis may be shifting from survival to purpose. Instead of waiting for God to rescue us and, consistent with national aspirations, we’re now also engaged in the sacred task of working with God to eradicate evil everywhere. Cooperating with people of all faiths and none, even with those who once were our enemies, has become our new challenge. It points to a better future. – Dow Marmur, “Modernity has taught Jews not to rely on God alone”, Toronto Star 03/18/12
Just what the world needs, another myth obsessed nation with doG on their side. Scroll up a bit and look at that last photo. Imagine the G.I. on the left with the smoke and the knee on the chest is wearing a Magic Beanie, as are the others, while they convince their target of doG’s Grace. In addition to scenes like that, we’ll be treated to images like this:
Why would Israel rely on Yaweh when they have Nukes?
Posted in Canada, Catholicism, Religion, journalism, politics, torture, woo
Leave a comment
Science is over my head, or in it
n the dead tree version of The Star, I ran across this completely credulous piece about acupuncture with a twist – a session performed in a kitchen between the chili and the pork roast.
Online it has the title Trusting my meat – and well being to alternative treatment. It may seem an unlikely combination but we’ll see how they’re tied together as evidence that acupuncture isn’t magic.
As is so often the case, the article begins with a vague personal anecdote about a painful back spasm that lasted a week until an hour at the acupuncturist left him whistling as he left the office. Probably from the wind rushing over all the holes poked into him.
I’m no evangelist for Chinese medicine. But it was once my saviour. While working as a cook, removing a 20-kilogram roasting tray of bones from the oven, my spine spasmed. For a week I could barely move. When I finally arrived at an acupuncturist’s clinic, it was by cab, my body bent to nearly 90 degrees, clutching a cane. An hour later, I walked out, whistling. If it weren’t for that, I would have the same healthy skepticism for acupuncture that I reserve for dry cleaning and True Blood (really, it’s a good show about vampires?).
Except that he is evangelizing, testifying to acupuncture being his saviour using his very public soap box. The choice of words with religious connotation is interesting as belief, faith, in this superstition has many similarities with spirituality. Healthy skepticism this is not despite the non-sequiturs aboot cleaning and TV.
His dinner companion and or co-patient is conveniently a needle phobic pediatrician who provides that ol’ canard aboot the limits of western medicine and who better to have on your side than a “western medicine man” slagging his own profession:
Western medicine
, he says, often fails us. “I don’t know what’s wrong with you,” he recounts having to tell many adult patients during his training. “But it’s not one of the emergencies that I’m trained to recognize.”
To which the author responds:
That’s what my doctor had told me and why I’d turned to acupuncture.
Typically there is no mention of what his doctor had to say or recommend or what was involved in the diagnosis. Or rather, non diagnosis as we are to believe his GP, after watching his patient hobble in and describe the nature and circumstances of his injury, had nothing more to say than ‘I don’t know because I’m untrained’? Bollocks. Given the very tenuous grasp the pediatrician has of what training is, one has to wonder if his comprehension of it is just as poor.
The reason for the between course puncturing? When asked “Do you guys have back pain right now?”. “Obvs” was the answer. If they were so obviously in back pain I doubt know even the untrained wouldn’t have to ask.
The author claims what he has experienced in the past and what he and his dinner companion are experiencing now is chronic pain. Except by his own description, his first visit most definitely was not an issue of chronic pain but of an injury suffered while lifting. From his description it is hard to tell how long transpired between the injury and getting out of the cab at the acupuncturists “bent to nearly 90 degrees, clutching a cane.” I doubt it would be much longer than the week spent hardly moving.
Is that chronic pain? A week or two of pain following an injury? That could be expected following any injury, depending on the severity. In time, it will pass on it’s own – if it is healing properly.
I know of two people who actually suffered debilitating chronic pain and tried acupuncture and chiropractic to no avail. There was no end of treatment for them, just endle$$ vi$it$ for very temporary relief if any. Western medical imaging allowed accurate diagnosis, showing one person had a ruptured disc, the other spinal stenosis. See, I can fling anecdotes too. I’m in the lead!
After the de riguer anecdotes we have the not unexpected underdog gambit – with a twist:
She charges on a sliding scale, with no questions asked, from $15 to $35. “Basically, I’m a villain in the acupuncture industry because the going rates are $50, if you’re lucky, to $125.”
Everyone loves the underdog, but see the twist? Rather than the dogmatic authority of science or Big Pharma, it is her own industry demonizing her for going against her training:
“We’re trained in school to spend an hour with a person and to charge them a whole lot of money,” says Yoon. Instead, her clinic sees multiple patients, simultaneously, in a large room, which lowers her overhead. “This is how acupuncture is practised traditionally in China and Korea.”
Is this because she’s trying to establish some new theory of Qi alignment? Nope. It’s how she bills the marks patients. Positively Shyamalanic.
The author may not buy the analogy used by the cut-rate shop to justify their discount prices:
Frank believes there is plenty of room for different types of practices. “You don’t have to have a gourmet meal every time you eat,” she says, an analogy that I can in no way endorse.
But has absolutely no problem swallowing eastern physiology:
What we’re doing right
now is not a proper treatment. There is something decadently self-involved in digesting food while meditating on the sensation in my skull, which, if I understand human physiology, is where the liver processes gamma rays. But the needles are barely in for 20 minutes. And I do have to start moving on the next course..
Does he understand physiology from any compass point? Obvs not. Has he bought a line of utter BS? The liver processes gamma rays. In. Our. Heads. Ancient Chinese secret, huh? There are very old Chinese texts and I doubt they refer to gamma rays, metaphorically or otherwise. Interestingly, these old texts have pictures of traditional Chinese implements and they look much like traditional European implements for blood letting. Apparently these medical instruments evolved from Greek origins:
There’s certainly no evidence that it’s 3000 years old. The earliest Chinese medical texts, from the 3rd century BC, don’t mention it. The earliest reference to “needling” is from 90 BC, but it refers to bloodletting and lancing abscesses with large needles or lancets. There is nothing in those documents to suggest anything like today’s acupuncture. We have the archaeological evidence of needles from that era – they are large;
So, how was this liver processing of gamma rays determined? How was it shown that these traditional needles – the technology for which didn’t exist until the late ancient 1700s – had any kind of effect when inserted into the skin of the skull? What measures were taken to determine the level of gamma ray exposure and what the flying fuck has it to do with anything like the chronic back pain they say they are treating twixt courses?
Ah yes, the food angle. It seems the author once followed a recipe and used a thermometer on a roast – SCIENCE! – but he messed it up. Therefore, the liver processes gamma rays. In. The. Skull. One has to wonder what the liver does in the liver, process bullshit? While the culinary arts and medicine both involve science, they aren’t nearly the same. It is disingenuous to equate the done-ness of a cut of meat with a health issue and claim an alleged “treatment” is valid simply because one’s ability to use an oven is lacking.
A wee digging would have shown our gullible chef that you can use toothpicks or some other sham variation anywhere on the body without piercing the skin and achieve the same results. Meridians? We need no stinking meridians. Toothpicks FFS, TOOTHPICKS.
Of course, that’s not all they treat at their low-cost, high turnover shop. The usual huge variety of often subjective and self limiting ailments all WHO approved and covered by insurance of course.
And there’s the harm – it is given credibility by an authoritative body of bureaucrats and quite often covered by insurance. This makes it a public issue and not one of personal choice because we’re all paying for quackery now through ever higher premiums. The desperately ill pay too by delaying or ignoring truly effective treatments. Ask Steve Jobs. When looking for images, the last link on the first results page was an advert to combat breast cancer holistically using acupuncture amongst other dubious treatments.
The truth is, though I’ve reread the explanations of food scientist Harold McGee, I don’t understand how heat works on meat any more than I understand how antibiotics or acupuncture function. I only know that none of them are magic. Acupuncture can’t make water boil and an MRI machine cannot get HBO.

He’s right in that acupuncture isn’t magic because it can’t make water boil. It is bullshit because the liver processes gamma rays in our skulls.
Another fine example, along with Dr. zardOz, of doctors, and journalists obvs, not being scientists and really not needing any understanding of science or how it works.In the end, just another variation on “science doesn’t know everything”. Well, science knows it doesn’t know everything, otherwise it’d stop:
Posted in acupuncture, journalism, medicine, quackery, woo
Leave a comment
It’s Tebow Time

hh, the arrogance of the faithful for they know all…
Tebow reminds me of ‘Test the Nation – IQ’ on CBC last year which had 6(?) teams of semi-famous types competing.
When asked of their chances, Team Faithful all claimed victory because “God Wills it”; “there’s two of everyone of us (pointing upward)”; gott mit uns… IIRC they came in third, behind Team Business and Team Atheist.
Another time, a rather large woman living in a trailer park in one US state just knew she was going to win the Powerball that weekend because she’d been prayin so hard to Jesus since she bought the ticket.
That very weekend another entire state was prayin (the Gov said so!) for the lives of 14(?) trapped miners. They died.
This reveals a capricious, heartless being. A trickster God.
Tebow is just further proof of this trickster. How many faithful bet Denver because of His obvious favour, while He bets da Pats.
Or, maybe Tebow touched himself before his big game.
Posted in Religion
Leave a comment
Broken Words:
the abuse of science and faith in American politics
Author: Jonathan Dudley
Publisher: Crown (ISBN 978-0-385-52526-8) 4/11

udley is a, shall we say, soft evangelist who has a broad education in both religion and biology. That should make for interesting arguments, but I also get the sense the author will have penned another apologia that has been rebutted ad nauseam:
“There is simply an urgent demand that we look now and accurately at how politics has led many among us to reversals of our historic faith and practice and, ultimately, to divisive and destructive civil policies and prejudices.” – Phyllis Tickle, an apologist of Episcopalian bent (from the jacket)
“Historic faith and practice” is an interesting choice of words as an historic practice of many Christian faiths was the burning of heretics. Mr. Dudley is far more progressive than that and actually does argue favourably for science while covering abortion, evolution, gay marriage and environmental issues.
His analysis of the religious aspect of those issues is, however, very familiar.
Before tackling “the big four” as he calls them, the author begins with personal information revealing his evangelical roots and his present ambivalence towards it. A somewhat rebellious youth who harbored doubts, he was able to receive an education beyond Bible college at Yale Divinity School. He is currently studying medicine at Johns Hopkins.
It was these experiences that have led him to this book and his thoughts on the negative aspects of current evangelical thinking. However, the preface ends with:
“Because I learned a few other things growing up as an evangelical Christian: that all truth belongs to God, that God created the natural world, that God cares about social minorities and outcasts, and all humans are finite and prone to err. And I’d like to see those beliefs – and not the big four – once again define the evangelical community.”
This lands Mr. Dudley square in the ‘God of the Gaps’ camp, ‘Watch Maker God’ division. He joins Francis Collins of the Human Genome Project in this well-worn philosophy of “science works because God created it that way” and went for a beer. This idea has been eloquently described by Neil deGrasse Tyson, a former believer himself, as the Perimeter of Ignorance. In that science is OK up until the limits of the knowledge you have learned by it, and then “Goddidit” rather than “I don’t know”. It presages arguments based on interpretation – with Dudley’s being the preferred form.
Sure enough, the meat of his arguments regarding abortion and stem cells boil down to “my interpretation is better than yours” – with a soupcon of science as backup. Unfortunately, the same can be said for the other three topics. While the author goes to great lengths to provide support for his particular Biblical interpretations, quoting a myriad of scholars whose interpretations jive with his, it really hinges on the unsurprising revelation that there are contradictory passages in the Bible.
The execrable literature of the Bible is explained away by Augustine, via Calvin, as the infinitely great speaking down to us as a parent to a child. All the internal inconsistencies, contradictions, gaps in logic etc. are due to the inability of the His Omnipotence to inspire Biblical writers to anything beyond childishness. I have read far better prose actually written by children, and yet The Great All-knowing couldn’t inspire adults with more clarity.
This literary lapse is called “divine accommodation” and somehow accounts for the”…ancient, outdated ideas about the natural world.” The earth being flat is mentioned because that is what the ancients understood, so God spoke to them in similar terms. Augustine lived around 400CE. The ancient Greeks knew the earth was around 24,000 miles in circumference about 800 years before. Popular theory had Columbus falling off the edge in 1492. Sophistry is a far more accurate term, not accommodation.
His get out of jail free card is the Augustinian idea of anything bad in the Bible is allegory while the good is real. While very conveniently allowing for the more bloody acts of God or his minions, the question remains, allegorical for what?
There are approximately 38,000 varieties of Christianity, each of which is believed to be the one, true Biblical interpretation. Mr. Dudley’s evangelism, while less fundamental in interpretation regarding the big four, is just another flavour.
His focus on the big four is centred on politics distorting religion and science in defense of his interpretation of the Bible and equates faith and science as viewpoints susceptible to preconceptions.
In failing to support this, there is no mention of other faiths beyond Judeo-Christendom, or the misogyny and slavery inherent in the Bible other than hand-waving them away. He also seems to misunderstand that the scientific method is based on our having preconceived notions and biases and so is meant to account for these shortcomings when properly applied.
Nor does he mention the separation of church and state, where the real abuse happens. I was hoping for something involving this aspect, but in the end the book is a hardly controversial, tarted up old pig.
Posted in Books, Religion, Review
Leave a comment
Hello world!

elcome to my home. Enter freely of your own will and leave some of the happiness you bring…
Why Quackademiology? A play on epidemiology, it refers to having a look at woo in populations and of factors which influence the prevalence of woo, rather than disease.
Woo, for the unfamiliar, is the “Western Medicine” cousin of ancient or traditional “Eastern Medicine”, or Wu. IOW, treatments which have no basis in reality, let alone backing evidence, honestly derived and regardless of origin.
Already, some are asking “What’s the Harm?”
Quite a bit it would seem. Many die who may have been helped or saved by what is derisively called allopathy, while the $CAM industry drives up costs of healthcare and benefit plans with bogus treatments.
Woo/Wu isn’t just medicinal. It has broader implications. Religion, obviously and its handmaiden, politics are too laced with woo.
So, come on in…
Al Kimeea
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment










